Return to Constantinople

This object is slightly different from the others that we have highlighted thus far however, in that it does not, solely as a physical object capture the authority that it appeals to. Rather, as an imitation of a previous coin, its direct source of authority is the original coin itself, through which it can access true source meanings and authorities. However, finding an exact replica for Latin Imitation coins is difficult- in his book on Latin Byzantium, Filip van Tricht comments that “elements of former [coin] types were combined into new hybrid types... The most remarkable characteristic of the Latin imitations is that they also bore the names of earlier Byzantine emperors.” [3]. Thus, here are noted two coins whose reverse and obverse (respectively) bear a strong resemblance to the imitation coin. The Gold Solidus pictured here is a much higher value coin than the imitation trachy, suggesting the question of how the mixed symbolism of imitation coins would have affected perceptions of value. Note the copper tetarteon: pictured is an image of St. George, whose portrayal on Byzantine currency traditionally signaled a time of strife or impending conflict [4].  

[1]. Grierson, Philip. Byzantine coins.

[2]. Laiou, Angeliki E. The economic history of Byzantium: from the seventh through the fifteenth century.

[3]. Van Tricht, Filip. "The Latin Renovatio of Byzantium."

[4]. Grierson, Philip. Byzantine coins.